Wetpixel.com: Dedicated to Digital Underwater Photography and Videography
Consumer ReviewsLatest ReviewsTop 200 Digital Cameras and AccessoriesRecently Added ProductsAll Review Categories
  >>Reviews >> Film >>Black and White Film >>

ProductImage
9 reviews 4.33 of 5  
 


 



Reviews

Review Options: Sorted by Latest Review Sort by Best Rating View All
Reviews 1 - 5   (9 Reviews Total)     Next 5

Review Date
March 21, 2004

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
3.00 of 5, 2 votes

Rate this review?

Battery Finder >>

Reviewed by
hacaden , Intermediate

Price Paid
$3.00 at B&H

Photography Experience
21+ years , Outdoor

Summary
A good folm. In fact, everything I can say about Plus-X would be "good". Not great, certainly not bad. Not what I would seek out, but something I would be willing to use with confidence. I find the grain structure looks best when exposed at ISO 64 rather than 125. and the tonal quality seems best that way, also.

Strengths
predictable

Weaknesses
a bit expensive

Similar Products Used
Agfa, Ilford, and Kodak products.

Customer Service
none needed

Report this review >>

 

Review Date
April 10, 2001

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
3.00 of 5, 2 votes

Rate this review?

Battery Finder >>

Reviewed by
Davidde Stella , Intermediate , from Detroit

Price Paid
$3.00 at B+H

Photography Experience
2-5 years , People

Summary
Good stuff. Buy it in bulk really cheap!

Strengths
Plus-X is really great stuff. If I am not mistaken, plus-x used to be the fastest stuff around, and everyone used that "development by inspection" technique that no one (including me) seems to know how to do today. Ok, so you are not going to enlarge it past a certain point (But didn't Robert Frank shoot all plus-x and enlarge it to 11x14?). Works particularly well in older emulsions like DIAFINE or Rodinol.

Weaknesses
None really. It's kinda slow and not as punchy as T-MAX 100. Yet, you should be using fill-flash anyway, right?

Similar Products Used
Most other Kodak b+w films.

Customer Service
Kodak has pretty nice charts.

Report this review >>

 

Review Date
November 28, 2000

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Rate this review?

Battery Finder >>

Reviewed by
Christopher Chen , Intermediate , from Washington, DC

Price Paid
$3.00 at Penn Camera

Photography Experience
6-10 years , Other

Summary
An all-time classic B&W film, perfect for achieving that 1930s HCB look. Easy to develop for beginners.

Strengths
As everyone knows, Plus-X is an easy-to-develop classic emulsion with wonderfully retro-looking grain, just like its sibling Tri-X. Great for portraits.

Weaknesses
Not for those seeking super-fine grain (use APX or TMX 100 instead).

Similar Products Used
APX 100, TMX 100, Delta 100.

Customer Service
Not needed.

Report this review >>

 

Review Date
July 4, 2000

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Visitors rate this review
1.00 of 5, 1 votes

Rate this review?

Battery Finder >>

Reviewed by
Sriram R , Intermediate , from Singapore, SG

Photography Experience
2-5 years , Landscapes

Summary
This once used to be my "crappy light" film. I now use Ilford FP4+ - I prefer the look.

Strengths
Very versatile film. Very tolerant to exposure and processing errors.

Weaknesses
Grainier than newer tech films (Delta, TMax)

Similar Products Used
FP4+

Report this review >>

 

Review Date
April 1, 2000

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
2.00 of 5, 1 votes

Rate this review?

Battery Finder >>

Reviewed by
Scott Haraldson , Intermediate , from Stillwater, Mn

Photography Experience
2-5 years , People

Summary
This is the film I primarily shoot with. I usually will only enlarge to 8x10. After that you start losing grain quality. Not much but enough to make me dissatisfied with a print.

Strengths
Easy to develope, provides a fairly tight grain.

Weaknesses
-

Similar Products Used
T-max, ilford

Customer Service
have yet to use it.

Report this review >>

 






www.PCPhotoREVIEW.com